The Justice Be Done - Badge
Badge
Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States - Badge
The National Trial Lawyers / Top 100 Trial Lawyers - Badge
Nationally Ranked Superior DUI Attorney 2014 - Badge
JUSTIA 10 - Badge
State Bar of Arizona - Badge
Lead Counsel Rated - Badge
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers NACDL Member - Badge
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2017 / DUI 2017 - Badge
National College for DUI Defense / General Member - Badge

Arizona Defendant Argues Against Conviction for Sexual Exploitation of Minor, Leading Court to Overturn and Remand for New Trial

Law Office of James Novak

In an August 2023 case before an Arizona court of appeals, the defendant successfully got his convictions overturned by arguing that the prosecution showed the jury too many prejudicial images during the defendant’s trial. Originally, the defendant was charged with sexual exploitation of a minor. His case went to trial, and a jury found him guilty. On appeal, however, the higher court considered the defendant’s argument, overturned the conviction, and set the case for a new trial.

Facts of the Case

According to the opinion, a detective in Arizona made contact with the defendant as part of a local sting operation. The detective posed as a 13-year-old girl and responded to the defendant’s advertisement asking for sexually exploitative photos. During the pair’s communications, the defendant continuously said that he did not mind the girl’s young age and that he wanted to be sent pictures of the girl’s genitalia.

Eventually, the State obtained a warrant to search the defendant’s phone and apartment. The State found many exploitative photos of young girls on the defendant’s devices, charging him with two counts of attempted sexual exploitation of a minor. The defendant’s case went to trial.

The Decision

On appeal, the defendant argued that the State showed the jury photos that unnecessarily prejudiced them against him. For example, the jury members saw dozens of photos from the defendant’s phone that were not related to the conversation that was the basis of these criminal charges. The additional photos that the State showed the jury were extremely inflammatory toward the defendant – they showed the genitalia of underage females, as well as young children performing sexual acts. Because these images were not related to the specific charges at issue, argued the defendant, the State should not have been allowed to introduce them as evidence.

The higher court, looking at the trial court’s record, agreed. The jury would have obviously become disgusted upon looking at the photos from the defendant’s phone. While these photos may be the basis for an additional criminal charge in the future, said the court, they were not related to the issue at hand during trial. Therefore, the State’s use of the photos was unwarranted.

Siding with the defendant, the court overturned the guilty conviction and sent the case back down for a new trial.

Are You in Need of a Criminal Defense Attorney in Arizona?

At the Law Office of James E. Novak, our quest is to make sure that each and every client receives the strongest defense possible, regardless of the severity of the charges. If you are looking for a qualified defense attorney in Arizona, look no further. For a free and confidential consultation, give our office a call today at 480-413-1499. We handle all types of cases, including sex crimes and violent crimes. You can also fill out our online form to have someone reach back out to you as soon as possible.

Arizona Criminal Defense Attorney Blog

Arizona Court’s Opinion Reinforces Case Law Dictating Trial Court Jurisdiction Over Defendants Over Eighteen Years of Age In a recent opinion published by the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, the court vacated a trial court’s dismissal of an assault indictment...

Recent Arizona Court Opinion Highlights Reality that Multiple Offenses Means Harsher Sentences In Arizona, if a defendant with prior convictions is found guilty of a crime, that defendant will face a harsher sentence than if he or she had no...

“Motive” as a Reason to Admit Otherwise Inadmissible Evidence at Trial When can an Arizona court admit evidence regarding a previous, seemingly unrelated offense during criminal proceedings? The answer is tricky, as...

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Initial Consultation
  2. 2 Available 24/7
  3. 3 Former Prosecutor

Fill out the contact form or call us at (480) 413-1499 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message