The Justice Be Done - Badge
Badge
Seal of the Supreme Court of the United States - Badge
The National Trial Lawyers / Top 100 Trial Lawyers - Badge
Nationally Ranked Superior DUI Attorney 2014 - Badge
JUSTIA 10 - Badge
State Bar of Arizona - Badge
Lead Counsel Rated - Badge
National Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers NACDL Member - Badge
Avvo Client's Choice Award 2017 / DUI 2017 - Badge
National College for DUI Defense / General Member - Badge

Self-Defense Justification in Arizona Assault and Violent Crime Cases

Law Office of James Novak

In Arizona, a person is justified in using physical force if the force is immediately necessary for that person’s protection. This justification is called self-defense. In a recent case before the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, the court found that the defendant did not prove he acted in self-defense during a violent altercation. With only the defendant’s oral testimony as proof of the self-defense, there was ultimately not sufficient evidence to support the defendant’s claim.

Details of the Case

According to the opinion, the defendant and the victim in this case got into a verbal argument one day at work. The defendant worked for a beverage company, the victim worked for a grocery store, and the defendant was dropping off beverages at the victim’s store. Because of confusion over the beverages, the individuals started yelling at each other.

The victim told the defendant to leave the store, and the defendant stabbed the victim from behind several times. The defendant then stood on top of the victim and continued to stab and kick him. The victim went to the hospital and sustained several serious injuries. Investigators later reviewed surveillance camera footage and determined that the defendant was the person who assaulted the victim.

Self-Defense Claim

The defendant pled not guilty, and his case went to trial. At trial, the defendant testified that the victim had a “bladed instrument” in his hand during the altercation. According to the defendant, he thought the victim was going to use the bladed instrument against him, so he took it from the victim’s hand and used it in self-defense.

The jury found the defendant guilty to aggravated assault, and he promptly appealed. On appeal, however, the higher court did not find evidence that the bladed instrument indeed belonged to the victim. In fact, said the higher court, no one ever found the instrument used in the assault at all. There was no additional evidence to support the defendant’s claim. The court therefore affirmed the original conviction and sentence.

Succeeding on a self-defense claim involves careful planning and concrete evidence. Oftentimes, oral testimony alone is not enough to succeed on this affirmative defense. If you have committed an assault in self-defense, make sure you have retained an expert, prepared Phoenix violent crimes lawyer that knows how to properly argue your case.

Do You Need a Phoenix Violent Crimes Lawyer in Your Corner?

If you have been charged with assault or another violent crime, you want to have the best representation possible by your side. At the Law Office of James E. Novak, we offer experience-based, aggressive representation for each and every one of our clients. Our team takes the necessary time to get to know each case in order to make sure we can prepare the best strategy possible and get the charges dropped. For a free and confidential consultation with an Arizona assault lawyer, give us a call today at 480-413-1499. You can also fill out our online “contact us” form to have a member of our team get back to you as soon as possible about your case.

Arizona Criminal Defense Attorney Blog

Arizona Court’s Opinion Reinforces Case Law Dictating Trial Court Jurisdiction Over Defendants Over Eighteen Years of Age In a recent opinion published by the Arizona Court of Appeals, Division One, the court vacated a trial court’s dismissal of an assault indictment...

Recent Arizona Court Opinion Highlights Reality that Multiple Offenses Means Harsher Sentences In Arizona, if a defendant with prior convictions is found guilty of a crime, that defendant will face a harsher sentence than if he or she had no...

“Motive” as a Reason to Admit Otherwise Inadmissible Evidence at Trial When can an Arizona court admit evidence regarding a previous, seemingly unrelated offense during criminal proceedings? The answer is tricky, as...

Contact Us

  1. 1 Free Initial Consultation
  2. 2 Available 24/7
  3. 3 Former Prosecutor

Fill out the contact form or call us at (480) 413-1499 to schedule your free consultation.

Leave Us a Message