In Arizona police are permitted to request a nonconsensual blood draw, without a warrant, from a DUI suspect who is unconscious under A.R.S. §28- 1321.
The provision does have limitations, and the blood draw can be unconstitutional if an individual’s rights are rights are violated in the process.
The Arizona Supreme Court held ruled that the unconscious clause is permissible only when invoked non-routinely, under exigent circumstances, and are case-specific.
In a recent case, the AZ Supreme Court ruled held that a DUI blood test taken under the unconscious clause was unconstitutional.
The Court ruling was decided based on the grounds that conditions were not exigent, and the test was requested due to a systematic procedure, rather than individual circumstances. Under the good faith exception, evidence collected in violation of Fourth Amendment privacy rights can still be admitted at trial if the police acted in good faith.
But the court also determined that the good-faith exception to the exclusionary rule did not apply.
In this article we will discuss the decision, what means for Arizona drivers, how to protect your rights, and what happens if your rights are violated.
Articles Posted in DUI defenses
Without consent, or a warrant it is unconstitutional for the police to collect a DUI blood sample.
There are a few exceptions in which the police can obtain a blood test for investigation
In this article we will focus on the DUI medical blood draw exception, to a search warrant.
Under exigent circumstances, police can request a blood sample that is taken incidental to a blood draw for medical purposes.
The Arizona Supreme Court recently considered the question of when this exception would apply.
The blood draw exception requires medical personnel to give some of the blood sample drawn for medical reasons to a law enforcement officer, upon request.
The police can request a sample for a DUI investigation only if they have probable cause to believe the driver was under the influence of drugs or alcohol.
Here we take a closer look at the case and decision involving the medical treatment exception. , the AZ Supreme Court added another layer of protection to assure a driver’s rights are protected by due process of law.
In the past if police requested a DUI blood test under the medical treatment exception, they needed to show probable cause, exigent factors, and that a blood test was being done for medical reasons. As a result of this decision, that state further needs to provide a showing that the driver’s rights to direct their own medical treatment were not violated.
after the Stop. Can an Arizona Officer’s misreading of an unambiguous law give rise to reasonable suspicion, thereby making a stop lawful? This was a question for a recent Arizona appellate court to decide. In the case, the court considered whether a sheriff’s deputy had reasonable suspicion to stop a suspect because the officer thought the rear display light on the driver’s vehicle was unlawful.
This article will explore how defense successfully challenged an otherwise unlawful police stop due to the police officer’s mistake of law with the following topics: Overview of the case and ruling; Impact of Appeals Court ruling in Arizona; Questions and answers; 11 rights you have at an unlawful stop; 10 reasons to file a motion to suppress evidence; DUI & Criminal Defense in Phoenix and East Valley AZ
Consent for DUI Testing Gained by Officer’s Warning of the Law does not Constitute Voluntary Consent…unless Good Faith Exception to the Exclusionary Rule Applies. This article provides a case over overview and discussion of legal principles that applied. Article features include: Impact of ruling on Arizona DUI suspects; Good Faith Exception to the Exclusionary Rule; Arizona Court decisions on what constitutes voluntary consent to search; and answers to the question of whether or not a suspect should consent to DUI testing in Arizona; and Common defenses for DUI charges in Arizona.
Continue reading ›If you are arrested for a DUI, you have a right to request an attorney’s assistance right away. But how much time are you given to find an attorney before you are given a Breathalyzer? In a recent Arizona Court of Appeals case, the defendant was convicted of aggravated DUI, for driving while impaired with…
Continue reading ›Your Guide to understanding the DUI blood test with medical treatment warrant exception. A DUI blood test taken by Police for investigating impairment is considered a search and seizure, protected by our 4th Amendment rights. This means that to obtain DUI blood or chemical evidence police would need either consent; or a warrant to order…
Continue reading ›The Arizona Appeal Court noted that that in order for an offense that occurred out of state to be counted as a “prior” the laws of the two states must be identical. Or alternatively, the offense must be such that if it had been committed in Arizona, instead of California in this case, it would have been in violation of Arizona’s impaired driving laws.
Continue reading ›A Tragic Video Confession You might remember the viral video of an Arizona man, 22 year old Matthew Cordle, who caused a fatal drunk driving accident. He provided a confession in a four-minute online video that went viral with 2.3 million views last September. Cordle began his chilling confession with “My name is Matthew Cordle…
Continue reading ›Driving under the influence of a legal drug in Arizona is not solely a defense for DUI. Last year, the Arizona Department of Public Safety revealed that prescription drugs were increasingly being found in the blood and urine tests of individuals who have been pulled over or arrested in Arizona and suspected of DUI. Prescription…
Continue reading ›“Actual Physical Control of a Vehicle” Tempe AZ In Arizona, under A.R.S. § 28-1381 and A.R.S. § 28-1382 a person a person may be charged with a DUI if they are impaired due to alcohol or drugs, and in “Actual Physical Control of a Vehicle (APC)”. A Supreme Court decision Arizona v. Zaragoza actually made…
Continue reading ›